Playing with Leo Messi is in the major cases a true delight for any partner. The Argentine is a perfect trailer for each assistance, an alternative of luxury on each pass and a type committed in the defense from the first line.However, there is a collective in the Camp Nou that has been doing with the presence of the Argentine. And is that, from that I read he debuted as Catalans, virtually no front achieved its best sensations next to "The flea". The phenomenon, so contrastable as surprising, is given in several football players over the past few years: men like Samuel Eto' or, Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Thierry Henry, Ludovic Giuly or Bojan ended up away from Barcelona and David Villa has not shown the level of excellence that reached in Valencia or in the Spanish team. The data speak for themselves: since hatching as maximum global in the 2008/09 season, the Argentine has exceeded systematically to all peers on the point of attack in sensations as well as goals.
Perhaps the only exception to all these cases is that of Eto' or. The Cameroon not end of harmonize with Guardiola does not mean your athletic performance Can boat out spectacular, making it probably the best nine of the Decade of the hurdle set. Your great pressure in the first line of battle and its scoring ability made that Messi, still evolving toward the total player that is now, saw in a perfect Squire that share the responsibility to door. However, the rest of the cases listed above are clear that the presence of Messi has not ejecido a positive effect on quality player. But... What is the real reason why this happens?
Messi game has changed with the passage of the seasons: If the 'flea' began located in the left band when just it was debuting, now its area of influence has become much larger. This circumstance, together with the particular employee scheme by the Barcelona, where only one of the strikers can be reference, requires a front top, that is the maximum star on your computer, may need to get used to playing in positions that are usually not theirs due to the "Leo effect". But this consideration has not only happened at the tip of the blaugrana attack. Men like Cesc Fábregas have also been more limited in their individual performance to the vast plot of field that is home to Leo. This curious contradiction, however, is reinstated by general coletivo, great philosophy of the Barça performance. All individual action is limited to its role in a space and a particular task at any time, and that allows that Messi is free to find their full potential escorted by a Center in the field of luxury capable of always choosing the best option. This analysis could not be complete if it does not compare the performance of Messi with Argentina. Curiously, your partnership with Higuain has become one of the major arguments to generate hazard by the albiceleste.
However, the collective performance of the selection is irregular and suffers, as if there were a direct and inversely proportional relationship between how Leo interacts with the front of reference and how makes the team overall. In short, the immense talent of Messi is which generates instability, not only in rival defenses, but also in the pure strikers who play with him. A paradox that, for now, has no solution.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar